Collins v. State of Nevada et al
| Mark Collins |
| I. Baca, Clark County Grand Jury and Nevada, State Of |
| 3:2016cv00433 |
| July 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER that respondents' motion to dismiss ECF No. 15 is granted; petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel ECF No. 22 and respondents' motion to strike ECF No. 32 are denied; petitioner will be denied a certificate of appealability; Clerk to enter final judgment in favor of respondents and against petitioner, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER directing Clerk to file, and denying, ECF No. 1 -3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; directing Clerk to file and e-serve ECF No. 1 -1 Petition on Respondents (NV AG added, NEF sent 5/31/2017), giving Respondents 45 days to answer. R eply due within 45 days thereafter. Any exhibits to be filed with separate index. Hard copies of any exhibits to be forwarded, for this case, to staff attorneys in Reno. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/31/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
