Rosaschi v. Wickham et al
Petitioner: Jamie Rosaschi
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General and Harold Wickham
Case Number: 3:2016cv00443
Filed: July 26, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Miranda M. Du
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER that Petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time to file motion to reopen (ECF No. 23 ) is granted; Clerk directed to reopen this case and lift the stay; Petitioner's motion to voluntarily dismiss petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 24 ) is granted; this action is dismissed without prejudice; Clerk instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close this action. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
July 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting Petitioner's ECF No. 18 Motion to Partially Waive LR IA 10-3(e); granting Petitioner's ECF No. 16 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Decisions in Related Cases, staying action pending conclusion of post-conviction proceedings in the state courts; directing Clerk to administratively close this action. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
October 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER - Clerk shall file the petition, and the motion for appointment of counsel. P's motion for appointment of counsel is granted. FPD is provisionally appointed to represent petitioner. FPD will have until 11/13/2016 to undertake direct re presentation of P or indicate inability to do so. If representation undertaken then amended complaint due by 12/13/2016. Clerk shall add AG as counsel for Rs. Clerk shall e-serve both AG and FPD a copy of the petition and a copy of this order. ( E-service on 10/14/2016.) Rs' counsel shall enter a notice of appearance by 11/3/2016, but no further response will be required until further order of the Court. Any exhibits must be filed with a separate index of exhibits as specified herein. The hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits must be forwarded for this case to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/13/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 10/14/2016 to reflect copy of Order mailed to P at WSCC (DRM).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosaschi v. Wickham et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Harold Wickham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jamie Rosaschi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?