Berry v. Baca et al
| Robert Logan Berry, Jr. |
| Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2016cv00470 |
| August 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER - It is ordered that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 24 ) is denied. It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is granted for ground 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to substitute Kyle Olsen for Respondent Isidro Baca, enter judgment accordingly, and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/29/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER that Petitioner's unopposed motion to extend time (ECF No. 38 ) is granted. Petitioner will have up to and including July 20, 2020, to file a reply to the answer (ECF No. 35 ).Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting ECF No. 36 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner will have up to and including July 6, 2020, to file a reply to the Answer (ECF No. 35 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/27/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER - Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28 ) is denied. Respondents will have 45 days from the date of entry of this order to file and serve an answer. Petitioner will have 45 days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/28/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting ECF No. 29 Motion to Extend Time : Response to ECF No. 28 Motion to Dismiss due by 8/12/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Answer/response to ECF Nos. 24 / 25 Amended petition due by 6/17/2019. Reply to answer due 45 days thereafter. (See pdf order for additional deadline specifics.) Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER that petitioner's motion for relief from judgment ECF No. 13 is granted; order and the judgment dismissing this action ECF Nos. 10 and 11 are vacated; petitioner's motion for leave to file an amended petition ECF No. 14 is granted; petitioner to file amended petition by 11/26/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting ECF No. 19 Motion to Extend Time : Reply to ECF No. 17 Response re ECF No. 14 Motion to amend complaint due by 3/16/2018. Reply to ECF No. 18 Response re ECF No. 13 Motion for relief from judgment due by 3/16/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting ECF No. 15 Motion for Enlargement of Time (First Request) to respond to ECF Nos. 13 motion for relief from judgment and 14 motion for leave to file an amended petition. Responses due by 2/20/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
11
JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 9/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) (Main Document 11 replaced on 9/26/2017) (DRM).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
