Gubbine v. Pope et al
Sonny James Gubbine |
Tara Carpenter, James Dzurenda, Starlin Gentry, Paul Malay and Charlie Pope |
3:2016cv00488 |
August 16, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Miranda M. Du |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDERED, adjudged and decreed that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (ECF No. 26 ) is accepted and adopted in full. It is further ordered that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20 ) is granted. It is further ordered that the Clerk enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 18 ORDER - Clerk shall E-SERVE AG a copy of this order and P's complaint (ECF No. 8 ). (E-service 6/1/2017; complaint via NEF regeneration.) AG shall file notice re acceptance of service by 6/22/2017; and file under seal address(es) for Ds for wh ich service not accepted. P must file a motion re any unserved Ds. If service accepted, the answer due by 7/31/2017. Henceforth P shall serve Ds a copy of every pleading submitted for consideration, together with a certificate of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 6/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.