Wiggins v. Seeley et al
Matthew Wiggins |
Richard Ooms, Andrew Seeley and Tiffany Ooms Seeley |
3:2016cv00642 |
November 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Howard D. McKibben |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Case Management Conference held on 4/27/2017 before Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. Crtrm Administrator: Katie Lynn Ogden; Pla Counsel: Stephanie Rice (Telephonically); Def Counsel: Michael McLaughlin (Te lephonically); Recorder: FTR; Recording start and end times: 1:30:27 p.m. - 1:36:39 p.m.; Courtroom: 2. Case Management Conference held. The court will correct the deadline for the joint pretrial order and all other de adlines contained therein the 22 stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order are APPROVED. The court and counsel agree to schedule a settlement conference on Tuesday, 7/11/2017, at 9:00 a.m. The court will enter a separate order scheduling the settlement conference hereafter. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO) |
Filing 18 ORDER denying ECF Nos. 6 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or Transfer and 13 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 03/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.