Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al v. Kendall Creek Homeowners Association et al
| Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
| Kendall Creek Homeowners Association and Nevada Association Services, Inc. |
| 3:2016cv00751 |
| December 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 33 ) is GRANTED. The claims for violation of NRS section 116.1113 and wrongful foreclosure are dismissed as time-barred. The Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 35 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment on the quiet title claim based on the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36 ) is DENIED. Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER that the Oral Argument currently set for 5/29/2018 at 10:00 AM is VACATED and RESCHEDULED to 6/15/2018 at 10:30 AM in Las Vegas Courtroom 4B before Judge Robert C. Jones. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
