Kerr et al v. U.S. Bank N.A.
Dennis Kerr and Terry Kerr |
Bank of America N.A., Darren Brenner, Micheal Brooks, R. Arron Chastain, William Habdas, Harmony Title Agency, Ramir Hernandez, Richard Reyenolds, U.S. Bank N.A. and U.S.Bank, N.A. |
3:2017cv00012 |
January 9, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Robert C. Jones |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER granting ECF No. 43 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens; expunging the lis pendens, Document No. 4669343, APN No. 089-344-02, Jan. 10, 2017, Washoe County Recorder. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/7/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 35 ORDERED that the Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 31 ) and the Motion to Stay (ECF No. 32 ) are DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 28 ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6 ) is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Default Judgment (ECF Nos. 8 , 26 , 27 ) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16 ) is DE NIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 20 ) is DENIED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2). FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.