Khamis v. 7-Eleven Inc et al
| Arthur Khamis |
| 7-Eleven Inc, Lisa Carrasco, Justin M. Demes, Craig Olsen and Paula Quigley |
| 3:2017cv00124 |
| February 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER - Defendant 7-Eleven's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 31 ) is granted. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of 7-Eleven and close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting nunc pro tunc ECF No. 34 Motion to Extend Time to file response to ECF No. 31 Motion for Summary Judgment Response due by 10/18/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER that the claims against Craig Olsen, Paula Quigley, Lisa Carrasco and Justin M. Demes are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 8/17/2017, denying Plaintiff's ECF No. 7 Motion for Reimbursement. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
