Hughes v. Goedert et al
Plaintiff: Danny L. Hughes
Defendant: Warren G. Goedert, Delmar L. Hardy and Joan C Wright
Case Number: 3:2017cv00174
Filed: March 22, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Miranda M. Du
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke ECF No. 8 is accepted and adopted in its entirety; Plaintiff's amended omplaint ECF No. 7 is dismissed without prejudice, without leave to amend; Clerk to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 08/31/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
July 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint ECF No. 7 be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND; Clerk to ENTER JUDGMENT and close this case. Objections to R&R due by 8/7/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 07/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
June 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER accepting and adopting in its entirety ECF No. 3 Report and Recommendation; granting ECF No. 1 IFP application; directing Clerk to file the complaint; dismissing without prejudice the complaint, with leave to amend as to Count I; dismissing with prejudice the complaint as to Count II; giving Plaintiff 30 days to file second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
June 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that ECF No. 1 IFP application be granted; that the Clerk file ECF No. 1 -1 complaint; that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend as to Count I; that the complaint be d ismissed with prejudice as to Count II; that Plaintiff be given 30 days to file amended complaint. Objections to R&R due by 6/15/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 5/31/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hughes v. Goedert et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warren G. Goedert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Delmar L. Hardy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joan C Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danny L. Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?