Chavez-Juarez v. State of Nevada et al
Petitioner: Antonio Chavez-Juarez
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State of
Case Number: 3:2017cv00192
Filed: March 29, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Miranda M. Du
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDERED that Chavez-Juarez's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 15) is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to substitute Perry Russell for Respondent State of Nevada, enter judgment accordingly, and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/4/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER - Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time to File an Answer to the Petition (ECF No. 31 ) is granted nunc pro tunc.Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply to the Answer (ECF No. 33 ) is granted. Petitioner must file his reply to the Answer (ECF No. 32 ) on or before August 10, 2020.Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/26/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
March 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER that Respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 19 ) is granted; Grounds one, two, and four are dismissed; Respondents will have 60 days from the date this order is entered to file an answer to the remaining ground in th e petition; Petitioner will have 45 days following service of Respondents' answer in which to file a reply; Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 25 ) is granted nunc pro tunc. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/4/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER - Petitioner's first and second motions for extension of time to file a first-amended petition (ECF Nos. 12 , 13 ) are both granted nunc pro tunc. It is further ordered that Respondents' motion for extension of time to file a responsive pleading (ECF No. 16 ) is granted. Respondents must file their responsive pleading on or before July 15, 2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
July 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER that counsel for Petitioner must meet with Petitioner as soon as reasonably possible, if counsel has not already done so, for review as outlined in order; petitioner has until 10/24/2018 to file and serve an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus; respondents will have (45) days after service to answer or otherwise respond; state court record exhibits filed by the parties herein must be filed with an index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter; parties must se nd courtesy copies of all exhibits to the Clerk of Court, 400 S. Virginia St., Reno, NV, 89501, and directed to the attention of Staff Attorney on the outside of the mailing address label. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
June 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that the Clerk file and e-serve the petition ECF No. 1 -1 on the respondents by adding AG as counsel for respondents (e-served 06/20/2018); Clerk to detach petitioners motion for appointment of counsel ECF No. 1 -2; motion for appointment of counsel is granted; FPD is appointed to represent petitioner; Clerk to e-serve FPD with copy of order, and petitioner for writ of habeas corpus ECF no. 1 -1 (e-served on 06/20/2018); FPD has until 07/20/2018 to file a notice of appeara nce or to indicate inability to represent petitioner; after counsel has appeared for petitioner, the Court will issue a scheduling order and set a deadline for the filing of an amended petition. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/20/2018. Copy of order mailed to petitioner. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
April 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying ECF No. 1 IFP Application. Payment of $5.00 filing fee due by 5/6/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/6/2018. (Mailed P 2 cps of order on 4/6/2018.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chavez-Juarez v. State of Nevada et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Antonio Chavez-Juarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?