Lutter v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Daniel J Lutter
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill and Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 3:2017cv00260
Filed: April 25, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Howard D. McKibben
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER - The court hereby ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 27 ). Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for remand (ECF No. 16 ) is DENIED, and the defendant's cross-motion to affirm (ECF No. 21 ) is GRANTED. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 9/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
August 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying 16 plaintiff's motion for remand or reversal, and granting 21 defendant's cross-motion to affirm. Objections to R&R due by 8/23/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 8/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN)
April 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that this action is transferred to the unofficial northern division of this District for all further proceedings. The Clerk of Court is instructed to transfer and reopen this matter as a new action under a new docket number in the northern division and to close this case without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/25/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lutter v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Daniel P. Talbert
Represented By: Jennifer Lee Tarn
Represented By: Holly A. Vance
Represented By: Mark E. Woolf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Daniel P. Talbert
Represented By: Jennifer Lee Tarn
Represented By: Mark E. Woolf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel J Lutter
Represented By: Cyrus Safa
Represented By: Leonard H Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?