McCaskill v. Baca et al
Petitioner: Leonard McCaskill
Respondent: Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2017cv00305
Filed: May 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER DISMISSING CASE - The Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Case (ECF No. 41 ) is granted. Clerk shall close the case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/29/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
January 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting ECF No. 39 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner will have up to and including May 19, 2021, to file a reply in support of his First Amended Petition (ECF No. 19 ). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/20/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING ECF No. 37 Motion to Extend Time : Reply to ECF No. 36 Answer to Amended Habeas Petition (ECF No. 19 ) due by 1/19/2021. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/24/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
September 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting ECF No. 34 Motion to Extend Time re ECF No. 19 First Amended Petition. Respondents' answer due 10/5/2020. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/4/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
July 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER DENYING ECF No. 22 Motion to Dismiss claim 4. Respondents will have sixty (60) days from the date of entry of this order (9/6/2020) to file and serve an answer. Reply due 45 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/8/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER that petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time (first request) (ECF No. 28 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner will have up to and including December 18, 2019, to file a response to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22 ). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/21/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER directing Respondents to file a response within 60 days to ECF No. 19 Amended Petition. Petitioner to reply within 30 days thereafter. Paper copies of any electronically filed exhibits need not be provided to chambers or to the staff attorney, unless later directed by the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/9/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
November 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER that petitioner's motion for extension of time (fourth request) (ECF No. 17 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner will have through February 11, 2019, to file and serve an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
August 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting ECF No. 14 Motion for Extension of Time to file Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Amended Petition due by 11/12/2018. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
May 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING ECF No. 12 Motion to Extend Time : Amended Petition due by 8/14/2018. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
October 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - Clerk shall file the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and the motion for counsel. The motion for appointment of counsel is GRANTED . FPD is provisionally appointed to represent petitioner. FPD shall undertake direct representatio n by 11/18/2017, or indicate inability to do so. If representation undertaken, then he shall have 60 days to file an amended petition. Clerk shall add AG as counsel for respondents. Clerk shall e-serve AG, and FPD a copy of the petition and a copy of this order. (E-service 10/19/2017.) AG shall enter a notice of appearance by 11/8/2017. And exhibits shall be filed with a separate index as specified herein. A hard copy of exhibits shall be sent to Las Vegas staff attorneys. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 10/19/2017 to reflect paper copy of order mailed to P at NNCC (DRM).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCaskill v. Baca et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Isidro Baca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Leonard McCaskill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?