Garcia-Gaona v. Wickham et al
Jose Manuel Garcia-Gaona |
Nevada Attorney General and Harold Wickham |
3:2017cv00360 |
June 9, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Miranda M. Du |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER granting Respondents' ECF No. 10 Motion to Dismiss the Petition as set forth in this order, dismissing with prejudice the petition; denying a certificate of appealability; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly and close case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 6 ORDERED that Clerk file and e-serve the petition ECF No. 1 -1 on the respondents (e-service on 12/18/17); Clerk directed to add NV AG as counsel for respondents; respondents to file a response to the petition by 3/18/2018; petitioner shall have 45 days from service of the answer, motion to dismiss, or other response to file a reply or opposition; any additional state court record exhibits filed herein; the parties SHALL SEND courtesy copies of all exhibits in this case to Reno Staff Attorney; Clerk directed to file ECF No. 1 -3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel and that it is denied. See Order for further details and instructions. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.