Vasquez v. Baca et al
| Rosendo Vasquez |
| Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2017cv00420 |
| July 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Howard D. McKibben |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDERED that this action shall be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction as a successive petition. Clerk shall make informal electronic service upon Rs by adding AG as counsel for respondents and directing a notice of electronic fi ling of this order to his office, (E-service on 11/22/2017.) Clerk shall direct regenerated NEFs of the prior filings herein to the AG, and that counsel shall file a notice of appearance by 12/13/2017.(Regenerated NEFs 1-9 to AG on 11/22/2019.) No other response is required from respondents other than to respond to any orders of a reviewing court. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Clerk further shall SEND petitioner a copy of the petition, order of dismissal and judgment (ECF Nos. 1, 11 & 12) from 2:09-cv-00834-LDG-RJJ with this order. (Mailed 11/22/2017.) Clerk shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 11/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 11/22/2017 for spelling (DRM).
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER directing the Clerk to file the petition; petitioner shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why thepetition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as a successive petition by 11/03/2017; if petitioner does not timely respond to this orde r, the petition will be dismissed as a successive petition without further advance notice; if petitioner responds but fails to demonstrate that the petition is not subject to dismissal as a successive petition, the action will be dismissed; all asser tions of fact made by petitioner in response to this show-cause order must be detailed, must be specific as to time and place, and mustbe supported by competent evidence; petitioner thus must attach copies of all materials upon which he bases his argument that the petition should not be dismissed as a successive petition. Unsupported assertions of fact will be disregarded. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/03/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
