Beers v. Baca et al
| Richard Charles Beers |
| Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2017cv00443 |
| July 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for petitioner's failure to comply with the court's order (ECF No. 4 ). Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. No certificate of appealability shall issue. Clerk shall add AG as counsel for respondents. Clerk shall e-serve respondents a copy of this order. No response is necessary. (E-service 10/26/2017.) Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER denying ECF No. 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner to send filing fees of $5.00 to the clerk of the court by 9/21/2017. Clerk directed to send Petitioner two copies of this order ( mailed to P on 08/22/2017). Petitioner is ordered to make the necessary arrangements to have one copy of this order attached to the check paying the filing fee. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 08/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
