Barragan v. Filson et al
Moises Barragan |
Warden Timothy Filson |
Adam Laxalt |
3:2017cv00453 |
July 27, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Larry R. Hicks |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER granting ECF No. 22 respondents' motion to dismiss; dismissing with prejudice ECF No. 16 Petitioner's second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus; directing Clerk to enter judgment and close this case; denyi ng a certificate of appealability; denying ECF No. 35 Barragan's motion for leave to conduct discovery; and granting nunc pro tunc all pending motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 37 , 38 , 39 , and 42 ). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Filing 20 ORDER the court GRANTS the motions for additional time (ECF Nos. 13 , 14 , 15 ) nunc pro tunc as of their respective filing dates. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 11 ORDERED - Petitioner's motion for leave to file a first amended petition (ECF No. 8 ) is GRANTED. Clerk shall file as a separate docket entry the first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus attached to petitioner's motio n (ECF No. 8 -1). Second amended petition due by 1/28/2017. Response to the second amended petition, within ninety (90) days of the date on which the petitioner files an amended petition or the date on which the period for filing an amende d petition expires. If respondents file an answer, petitioner shall have sixty (60) days to file and serve a reply. If respondents file a motion to dismiss, petitioner shall have sixty (60) days from the date on which the motion is served on him t o file and serve a response to the motion to dismiss, and respondents shall, thereafter, have thirty (30) days to file a reply in support of the motion. Any additional state court record exhibits filed herein by either petitioner or respondents sh all be filed with a separate index of exhibits as specified herein; and a hard copy forwarded to the staff attorneys in Reno. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners motion for scheduling order (ECF No.[ 9]) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 6 ORDER that petitioner' s ex parte motion for appointment of counsel ECF No. 5 is GRANTED; FPD is appointed to represent petitioner; if the FPD is unable to represent the petitioner, due to a conflict of interest or other reason, then a lternate counsel will be appointed; Clerk directed to e-serve the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (e-served and NEF regenerated on 10/12/2017); FPD to file a notice of appearance by 11/01/2017; Clerk directed to add AG as counsel for respondents; Clerk directed to e-serve respondents a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus and a copy of this order (e-served and NEF regenerated on 10/12/2017); Respondents to file a notice of appear ance by 11/01/2017; Respondents will not be required to respond to the habeas petition at this time; Court will establish a schedule for further proceedings; petition's motion for appoint of counsel ECF No. 2 , motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ECF No. 3 are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.