Rockhill Insurance Companies v. CSAA Insurance Exchange et al
| Rockhill Insurance Companies |
| CSAA Insurance Exchange and Premier Restoration and Remodel, Inc. |
| 3:2017cv00496 |
| August 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Howard D. McKibben |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
ORDER granting Rockhill's ECF No. 88 Motion for Summary Judgment on Rockhill's Amended Complaint; denying CSAA's ECF No. 90 Motion for Summary Judgment on its counterclaims; denying as moot Rockhill's ECF No. 99 Motion to Strike; directing Clerk to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Rockhill, on its Amended Complaint and against the defendants, CSAA and Premier, on their Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/9/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER granting ECF No. 115 Motion to Withdraw Attorney Daniel T. Hayward for Rockhill Insurance Companies. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 7/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER granting ECF No. 100 Stipulation to Extend Time. Responses to ECF Nos. 88 and 90 Motions for Summary Judgment due by 7/3/2019. Replies to ECF Nos. 88 and 90 Motions for Summary Judgment due by 7/29/2019. Responses to ECF No. 99 Motion to Strike due by 7/8/2019. Replies to ECF No. 99 Motion to Strike due by 7/17/2019. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 6/21/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting ECF No. 86 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Mark A. Deptula for Rockhill Insurance Companies, and approving Designation of Local Counsel. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 4/25/2019. Any att orney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website www.nvd.uscourts.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
72
PROTECTIVE ORDER re 70 Motion re Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting ECF No. 67 Stipulation for Extending Time to file Reply in Support of ECF No. 64 Motion for Judgment. Reply due by 8/22/2018. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting ECF No. 56 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Lisa A. Taylor of the Law Office of Lisa A. Taylor on behalf of Defendant/Counter-Claimant in place and stead of Stephen G. Castronova. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 5/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting ECF No. 53 Request to Withdraw CSAA's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Alternative Motion to Stay. The telephonic motion hearing set for Wednesday, 4/11/2018 at 9:00 AM is hereby vacated. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 4/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) Modified on 4/10/2018 (PR).
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 24 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint. Defendant CSAA Insurance Exchange answer due 1/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
