Belsher v. Pescio et al
Isabelle M. Belsher |
Avenue Gift, LLC, JPIB, LLC, Performance Athletic Club and Janet Pescio |
3:2017cv00589 |
September 22, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Larry R. Hicks |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 ORDER granting ECF No. 42 Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting in part and denying in part ECF No. 12 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing Defendants Avenue Gifts LLC and Janet Pescio; dismissing in their entirety Plaintiff's third cause of action for promissory estoppel and fourth cause of action for breach of contract. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 25 ORDER that defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 8 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting ECF No. 9 Stipulation to extend time to Respond to ECF No. 8 Motion to Dismiss. Response due by 12/29/2017. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.