Brown v. Warden Baker et al
| Jason S Brown |
| Nevada Attorney General and Warden Baker |
| 3:2017cv00687 |
| November 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting Respondent's ECF No. 20 Motion to Dismiss, dismissing with prejudice ECF No. 19 First Amended Petition as time-barred; denying Petitioner's ECF No. 37 Motion for Evidentiary Hearing; denying a certificate of appealability; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly and close case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/12/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting ECF No. 44 Motion to Extend Time :Respondents will have until August 30, 2019, to file and serve their response to Petitioner Jason S. Brown's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (ECF No. 37 ), and any surreply in support of the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20 ). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER - Petitioner's Motion to File Corrected Response (ECF No. 36 ) is granted. Respondents will have until August 9, 2019, to file any surreply in support of the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 20 ), and respond to Petitioner's Motion to Seal (ECF No. 39 ) and Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (ECF No. 37 ). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER that Petitioner's motion for leave to file excess pages (ECF No. 33 ) is granted. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting ECF No. 29 Petitioner's fourth unopposed motion for extension of time to file an opposition to ECF No. 20 Motion to Dismiss. Response/Opposition due by 5/3/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting ECF No. 27 Unopposed motion for extension of time to file opposition to ECF No. 20 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition/Response due by 4/19/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting ECF No. 25 Motion for Extension of Time to file an opposition to ECF No. 20 Motion to Dismiss. Response/Opposition due by 4/5/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting ECF No. 23 Petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time. Petitioner will have until 3/15/2019, to file an opposition to ECF No. 20 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting ECF No. 16 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner to file Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by 11/20/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER that Petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time (ECF No. 14 ) is granted. Petitioner will have until November 13, 2018, within which to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER that ECF No. 12 Petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time to file an amended petition is granted; amended petition due by 10/22/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER that the Federal Public Defender, through S. Alex Spelman, is appointed as counsel for petitioner; petitioner will have until up to and including 06/24/2018 to file an amended petition and/or seek other appropriate relief; that re spondents will file a response to the amended petition within (60) days of service of an amended petition and that petitioner may file a reply within (30) days of service of an answer; any exhibits filed by the parties must be filed with a separate i ndex of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter; hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits must be forwarded for this case to the Reno Clerks Office. See Order for further details and information. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER - Clerk directed to file the petition (ECF No. 1 -1), motion for a stay (ECF No. 1 -2) and motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1 -3); the motion for a stay is denied without prejudice; the motion for appointment of counsel is granted; FPD appointed as counsel for petitioner and has 30 days to undertake direct representation of petitioner or indicate to the Court the office's inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings; Clerk directed to add AG as co unsel for respondents; AG notice of appearance due by 3/15/18; Clerk directed to send a copy of this order to NV AG, FPD, and CJA Coordinator; Clerk directed to provide copies of all prior filings to AG and FPD ((E-service and NEFs sent 2/22/18). See order for further details. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
