Hernandez v. Warden Legrand et al
Joseph A Hernandez |
Legrand and Nevada Attorney General |
3:2017cv00697 |
November 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Miranda M. Du |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 14 ) is denied. It is further ordered that Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/1/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 34 ORDER granting Petitioner's ECF No. 33 Motion to Extend Time re ECF No. 30 Answer to ECF No. 14 Amended Petition: Reply due by 12/3/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 29 ORDER denying in its entirety Respondents' ECF No. 15 Motion to Dismiss; directing Respondents to file an answer to ECF No. 14 Amended Petition within 60 days. Petitioner to reply within 30 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting ECF No. 25 Motion for Enlargement of Time to file reply to ECF No. 15 Motion to Dismiss. Reply due by 2/25/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Filing 23 ORDER granting ECF No. 21 Motion for Extension of Time to file opposition to ECF No. 15 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition/Response due by 1/28/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/11/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting ECF No. 12 Unopposed motion for an extension of time. Amended Petition due by 11/6/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Filing 11 ORDER appointing FPD S. Alex Spellman as counsel for Petitioner. Amended Petition due within 120 days. Respondents' response due within 60 days thereafter. Petitioner's reply due within 30 days of response. Any exhibits to be filed with separate index. Hard copies of any exhibits to be forwarded, for this case, to the Reno Clerk's Office. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting ECF No. 8 Motion to Extend Time : FPD to enter a notice of appearance or otherwise respond to the Court's prior order (ECF No. 3 ) by January 24, 2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 3 ORDER that Petitioner's IFP application ECF No. 1 is denied; filing fee ($5) due 1/3/18; clerk directed to file ECF Nos. 1 - 1 Petition and 1 - 2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; ECF No. 1 - 2 Motion for Appointment of Coun sel is granted; FPD has until 1/3/18 to make an appearance; clerk directed to add AG as counsel for respondents and e-serve this order (e-served on 12/4/17); Respondents' notice of appearance due 12/25/17; clerk directed to send a copy of this order to FPD and CJA coordinator (e-served on 12/4/17); clerk directed to send copies of all prior filings to AG and FPD (NEF regenerated on 12/4/17); clerk to provide P 2 copies of this order (mailed to P on 12/4/17). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.