Kramer et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| Audrey Kramer and Leo Kramer |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc,, National Default Servicing Corporation and Washington Mutual Bank, N.A. |
| 3:2018cv00001 |
| January 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDERED Plaintiffs' motion to strike MERS's motion 43 is denied; Further ordered Chase and MERS's Motions to dismiss 17 22 are granted; Further Order that Plaintiffs' pending motions 30 46 55 56 and obj 51 are denied as moot. Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case ; Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - WJ)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER that ECF No. 8 Stipulation for Extension of Time for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. to respond to ECF No. 1 Complaint is DENIED without prejudice; this case is stayed until 2/22/2018 or until each of the Plaintiffs p ost the required security; Defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. will have twenty days thereafter to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 1/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
