Kelsey v. Baker et al
| Zachary Kelsey |
| Renee Baker, James Dzurenda and Adam Laxalt |
| Adam P. Laxalt |
| 3:2018cv00174 |
| April 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 6 ) remains denied. A certificate of appealability is granted for grounds 1 and 2.The Clerk of Court is directed to substitute Tim Garrett for respondent Renee Baker. The Clerk of Court shall not amend the judgment previously entered on August 22, 2019. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/29/2022., Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LG)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting ECF No. 50 Motion to Extend Time. Kelsey will have until January 21, 2022, to reply to the Respondents' response (ECF No. 49 ) to his supplemental brief (ECF No. 44 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/18/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER - Respondents' motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 47 ) is granted. Respondents will have until December 20, 2021, to respond to Kelsey's supplemental brief (ECF No. 44 ). In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the Order entered July 15, 2021 (ECF No. 40 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/15/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER - It is ordered that Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 45 ) is granted. Respondents will have until December 13, 2021, to respond to Kelsey's supplemental brief. It is further ordered that, in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the Order entered July 15, 2021 (ECF No. 40 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/13/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER re ECF No. 38 USCA Order : Clerk of Court shall reopen this action. Within seven (7) days (7/22/2021), Kimberly Sandberg shall file a notice of appearance. Within seven (7) days (7/22/2021), the Respondents shall file the depositi on testimony of John Ohlson and the expert report as supplemental exhibits. Within forty-five (45) days (8/29/2021), Kelsey shall file supplemental briefing addressing the sole issue upon which the Ninth Circuit granted a certificate of a ppealability. Respondents shall respond to Kelsey's briefing within forty-five (45) days after being served with that briefing. Kelsey may then file a reply within thirty (30) days of the response. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/15/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 6 ) is denied; Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability; Clerk directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/22/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying ECF No. 22 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; Petitioner to file a reply to ECF No. 16 Answer to Habeas Petition by 12/20/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDERED that ECF No. 14 Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to ECF No. 6 habeas corpus petition is granted; Respondents answer/response due by 9/4/2018; and in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered May 16, 2018 (ECF No. 5 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/31/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER that ECF No. 11 Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time to respond to ECF No. 6 habeas corpus petition is granted; response/answer due by 8/30/2018; in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the Order entered May 16, 2018 (ECF No. 5 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER - Clerk directed to separately file the habeas petition (ECF No. 1 -1) and the motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1 -2); Clerk directed to add the NV AG as counsel for respondents and electronically serve a copy of the petition and a copy of this order (e-service on 5/17/2018); respondents notice of appearance and answer/response to the petition due by 7/16/2018; petitioner will have 60 days from service of the answer, motion to dismiss, or other response to file a reply or opposition; petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER that petitioner's IFP application (ECF No. 1 ) is denied; $5 filing fee due by 6/11/2018; failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action; if Kelsey is unable to pay the filing fee, he may file a new IFP application; Clerk directed to send petitioner 2 copies of this order (mailed to petitioner on 4/27/2018). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
