Rowell v. Dzurenda

Rowell v. Dzurenda

Plaintiff:	Lamarr Rowell
Defendant:	James E. Dzurenda
Case Number:	3:2018cv00183
Filed:	April 26, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Reno Office
Presiding Judge:	William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge:	Miranda M. Du
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 8, 2018	Filing 6 ORDER that the motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 5 ) is denied with respect to the dismissal of the complaint and granted with respect to the request to proceed in forma pauperis; the Court vacates the portion of ECF No. 3 screening order that dismissed the IFP application as moot; Clerk directed to reinstate the IFP application (ECF No. 1 ) as an active pending motion; the IFP application (ECF No. 1 ) is granted; NDOC to pay Clerk from inmate account (copy of order sent to Finance and Albert G. Peralta, NDOC Chief of Inmate Services); even if this action is unsuccessful, the full filing fee shall still be due; any in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 8, 2018

Filing 6 ORDER that the motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 5 ) is denied with respect to the dismissal of the complaint and granted with respect to the request to proceed in forma pauperis; the Court vacates the portion of ECF No. 3 screening order that dismissed the IFP application as moot; Clerk directed to reinstate the IFP application (ECF No. 1 ) as an active pending motion; the IFP application (ECF No. 1 ) is granted; NDOC to pay Clerk from inmate account (copy of order sent to Finance and Albert G. Peralta, NDOC Chief of Inmate Services); even if this action is unsuccessful, the full filing fee shall still be due; any in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rowell v. Dzurenda
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: James E. Dzurenda
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lamarr Rowell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?