Bonham v. Baker et al
| Bryan P. Bonham |
| R. Baker, D. Carpenter, Gouvea and H. Wickham |
| 3:2018cv00242 |
| May 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This action is dismissed with prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to file a stipulation to dismiss or otherwise show cause why his statements at the settlement conference did not constitute an intent to dismiss his case. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/24/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER - Plaintiff's Objection (ECF No. 71 ) to the Report and Recommendation is overruled. The Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (ECF No. 70 ) is adopted in full. Plaintiff's Motion for Summa ry Judgment (ECF No. 31 ) is denied. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's claim that Defendants Renee Baker, David Carpenter, and Harold Wickham violated his Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process rights by not allowing him to call a witness in his defense will proceed. However, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted as to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment cla im against Defendant Jaime Gouveia. His claim against Defendant Gouveia will not proceed. Further, Defendants' Motion is granted as to all Defendants' insofar as Plaintiff disputes that their decisions and affirmations of his guilty verdict were not based on "some evidence." Those claims will not proceed. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/26/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER - Clerk shall STRIKE Plaintiff's Motion (ECF No. 65 ) as it exceeds the page limits for Motions which is 24 pages, and Plaintiff's Motion, exclusive of exhibits, is 34 pages. LR 7-3(b). To the extent this motion can be construed as requesting an order compelling the production of documents, that request is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/26/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER - Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion (ECF No. 52 ) is DENIED for the reasons set forth in this Court's Order of June 30, 2020 (ECF No. 50 ). If Plaintiff is dissatisfied with the Court's ruling in its Order (ECF No. 50 ), Plai ntiff may file an objection to the Order under LR IB 3-1 and 28 USC § 636(b)(1)(A). However, any objection must be filed within fourteen (14) days of service of the Order (ECF No. 50 ). Clerk shall serve Plaintiff with this Order at both LCC and HDSP (Electronic Service on 7/6/2020). Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 7/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 48 Ex Parte Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Request for an Evidentiary Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 6/30/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER - Plaintiff's Request (ECF No. 27 ) is GRANTED. Clerk is directed to send a copy of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (ECF No. 25 ) and Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 17 ) to Plaintiff (Mailed to Plaintiff at HDSP on 3/17/2020). Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/17/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER denying Plaintiff's ECF No. 17 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER that Plaintiff's IFP application (ECF No. 1 ) is GRANTED; NDOC to pay Clerk from inmate account; Clerk directed to send a copy of this order to Finance and NDOC Chief of Inmate Services (E-service to Finance and mailed to NDOC C hief on 9/18/2019); Clerk directed to e-serve NV AG with a copy of this order and a copy of ECF No. 4 Complaint (E-service and NEF regenerated on 9/18/2019); service must be perfected by 12/17/2019; AG to advise Court by 10/9/2019 re acceptance of service and/or provide last-known-address information under seal; plaintiff to file a motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and specifying a full name and address for the defendant(s); answ er/response due within 60 days for any defendants represented; Plaintiff shall serve defendants copy of all pleadings and include certificate of service; this case is no longer stayed. See order for further details and instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
