Moss v. Filson et al
Clint B. Moss |
Filson and Nevada Attorney General |
3:2018cv00286 |
June 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Howard D. McKibben |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER that the petition is DISMISSED; a certificate of appealability is denied; Clerk directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Filing 3 ORDER that Clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition (ECF No. 1 ) on the respondents (E-service on 8/3/2018); Clerk shall add NV AG as counsel for respondents; petitioner shall have until 9/2/2018 to show cause and file such proof he may have to demonstrate that the petition for writ of habeas corpus was timely filed within the one-year time limitation or that he is entitled to equitable tolling of the time period; if petitioner files such proof, respondents shall have 20 days to file any response to petitioner's proof; if petitioner is unable to demonstrate that the petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed within the limitations period or that he is entitled to equitable tolling, the court will enter an order dismissing the petition. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.