Bynoe v. Foley
Petitioner: Michael Bruce Bynoe
Respondent: Darla Foley
Case Number: 3:2018cv00326
Filed: July 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin Carry
Referring Judge: Valerie P Cooke
2 Judge: Miranda M Du
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2018 Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (LH)
July 6, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE : No Application to Proceed I.F.P. or Filing Fee was received with Petition by Michael Bruce Bynoe. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus)(LH)
July 6, 2018 Case assigned to District Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bynoe v. Foley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Darla Foley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Bruce Bynoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?