Pamplin v. State of Nevada
Petitioner: John David Pamplin
Respondent: Attorney General for the State of Nevada and State of Nevada
Case Number: 3:2018cv00378
Filed: August 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G Cobb
Referring Judge: Robert C Jones
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2018 Filing 11 MOTION - Refiling Request for Personal Restraint Petition Injunction, by Petitioner John David Pamplin. Responses due by 10/18/2018. (DRM)
October 4, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner John David Pamplin. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(DRM)
September 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that petitioner's request for a copy of his petition ECF No. #8 is GRANTED; Clerk directed to send petitioner a copy of his petition ECF No. #1 -1 (mailed to P on 9/27/2018). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/27/2018.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
September 24, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION, filed by Petitioner John David Pamplin. Responses due by 10/8/2018. (KW)
September 24, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address, filed by Petitioner John David Pamplin. OLD: ESP to NEW: WSCC. (KW)
August 22, 2018 Filing 6 LETTER from John Pamplin re ECF No. #3 Order Dismissing Case; and requesting forms for a "Personal Restraint Petition" and copies. (DRM)
August 20, 2018 Filing 5 LETTER requesting file stamped copies, from John Pamplin. (DRM)
August 14, 2018 Filing 4 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 8/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER dismissing this action; denying a certificate of appealability; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
August 10, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against State of Nevada, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:18-cv-00378-RCJ-WGC. (KW)
August 10, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE No IFP Application, or Filing Fee was received with initiating documents, filed by John David Pamplin. (Attachments: #1 Request, #2 Envelope)(KW)
August 10, 2018 Case assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pamplin v. State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John David Pamplin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General for the State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?