Pamplin v. Warden Ely State Prison et al
John David Pamplin |
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Warden Ely State Prison and Nevada Attorney General |
3:2018cv00382 |
August 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Carla Baldwin Carry |
Robert C Jones |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address, filed by Petitioner John David Pamplin. OLD: ESP to NEW: WSCC. (KW) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE - Due to the retirement of Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, this case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:18-cv-00382-RCJ-CBC. (no image attached) (DRM) |
Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Petitioner John David Pamplin. (KR) |
Filing 3 LETTER to Clerk requesting file stamped copies, from John Pamplin. (DRM) |
Case assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Ely State Prison Warden, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:18-cv-00382. (KW) |
Filing 1 NOTICE: No IFP Application, of Filing Fee was received with Initiating Documents, filed by John David Pamplin. (Attachments: #1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus)(KW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.