Doe v. Carson City et al
| Jane Doe |
| Joyce Phillips, Carson City, Jacobs Entertainment, Inc., Jaye Phillips and Carson City, City of |
| 3:2018cv00428 |
| September 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Larry R Hicks |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Jacobs Entertainment, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Jaffe, Steven) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Jacobs Entertainment, Inc..(Jaffe, Steven) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. (Lagomarsino, Andre) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Therese Shanks on behalf of Defendant Carson City, City of. with Certificate of Service (Shanks, Therese) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Carson City, City of. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Robison, Kent) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss #7 Amended Complaint by Defendant Carson City, City of. Responses due by 11/6/2018. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 12/7/2018. (Robison, Kent) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. served on 10/5/2018, answer due 10/26/2018. (Lagomarsino, Andre) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Carson City, City of served on 10/3/2018, answer due 10/24/2018. (Lagomarsino, Andre) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jaye Phillips. (DRM) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Jane Doe. Adds and removes parties. Proof of service due by 12/26/2018.(Lagomarsino, Andre) |
| Filing 6 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Jaye Phillips by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Lagomarsino, Andre) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting ECF No. #4 Motion for Leave to proceed in Pseudonym. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/10/2018.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION For Leave to Proceed in Pseudonym by Plaintiff Jane Doe. Responses due by 9/20/2018.(Lagomarsino, Andre) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Joyce Phillips, #2 Jacobs Entertainment, Inc.) (DRM) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Jane Doe. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Lagomarsino, Andre) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carson City, Jacobs Entertainment, Inc., Joyce Phillips (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5226342) by Jane Doe. Proof of service due by 12/3/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Carson City, #3 Summons Jacobs Entertainment, Inc., #4 Summons Joyce Phillips)(Lagomarsino, Andre) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
