Sanchez v. Gittere et al
| Jasmine Paul Sanchez |
| P. Hunt, William Gittere and A Jacoby |
| 3:2018cv00475 |
| October 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE, filed by Jasmine Paul Sanchez. (KW) |
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jasmine Paul Sanchez. (LH) |
Filing 3
ORDER that the Clerk SHALL SEND Plaintiff the approved IFP form by a prisoner and instructions (mailed to P on 10/10/2018); Fully complete IFP application or $400 filing fee due by 11/9/2018; if Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order, dismissal of this action may result; Clerk shall retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1), but shall not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
| Case assigned to District Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (KW) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE: No IFP Application, or Filing Fee was received with Initiating Documents, by Jasmine Paul Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Financial Certificate, #3 Envelope)(KW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
