Gentry et al v. U.S. Treasury Department
| Michael Edward Gentry and Laurie Anne Gentry |
| U.S. Treasury Department |
| 3:2018cv00581 |
| December 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin Carry |
| Miranda M Du |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7426 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting ECF No. #12 for Extension of Time to Respond to ECF No. #1 Complaint. U.S. Treasury Department response/answer due 3/26/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 2/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to #6 Motion by Defendant U.S. Treasury Department. Replies due by 2/13/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration) (Stevko, Alexander) |
| Filing 12 First MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) to respond to complaint re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant U.S. Treasury Department. (Stevko, Alexander) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 1/29/2019. The court has received and reviewed the defendant's notice of restoration of appropriations (ECF No. #10 ). The STAY in this case is lifted. The defendant shall respond to the "motion for claim of relief" on or before February 15, 2019. Plaintiff's motion to quash the plea for stay (ECF No. #9 ) is DENIED as moot. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of restoration of appropriations by U.S. Treasury Department. (Stevko, Alexander) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Quash Plea for Stay, by Plaintiff Michael Edward Gentry. Responses due by 2/5/2019. (DRM) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting ECF No. #7 Motion to Stay Motion Response Deadline in Light of Lapse of Appropriations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 1/15/2019.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Stay Case re #6 Motion by Defendant U.S. Treasury Department. (Stevko, Alexander) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Claim of Relief; Constitution Question; Presumptive Taxation; Denial of Due Process, filed by Plaintiff Michael Edward Gentry. Responses due by 1/25/2019. (KW) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Service upon defendant Dept. of Treasury via certified mail on 12/26/2018. (DRM) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to U.S. Treasury Department, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (LH) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER.This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/11/2018. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (KW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Treasury Department (Filing fee $400 PAID Receipt No. NVRNO004387), filed by Michael Edward Gentry, Laurie Anne Gentry (attachments filed under seal due to personal identifiers). Proof of service due by 3/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KW) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/10/2018: #2 Certificate of Release of Federal Tax Lien, #3 SS Notice, #4 1040 Tax Return, #5 1040X Amended Tax Return, #6 IRS Notice, #7 Letter of Disaggrement, #8 Collection Appeal Request) (KW). |
| Case assigned to District Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
