Sutton v. Baker et al
Petitioner: Kevin D. Sutton
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General and Renee Baker
Case Number: 3:2018cv00598
Filed: December 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin Carry
Referring Judge: Miranda M Du
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2019 Filing 8 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 1/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
January 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that the IFP application (ECF No. #1 ) is granted; this action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as a second or successive petition; Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability; Clerk directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
January 16, 2019 Filing 6 RESPONSE The Showing of Cause Why Petition should Not Be Dismissed as a Successive Petition per ECF No. #3 Order to Show Cause, filed by Petitioner Kevin D. Sutton. (KW)
January 8, 2019 Filing 5 FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE re ECF No. #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Kevin D. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Letter) (KW)
January 4, 2019 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kevin D. Sutton (filed per ECF No. #3 Order). (KW)
January 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER directing the Clerk to file the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus ECF No. #1 -1; Petitioner to show cause, in writing, why the petition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as a successive petition by 2/3/2019; all assertions of fact made by Petitioner in response to this show-cause order must be detailed, must be specific as to time and place, and must be supported by competent evidence. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
December 26, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Renee Baker, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:18-cv-00598-MMD-CBC. (KW)
December 26, 2018 Case assigned to District Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry. (WJ)
December 21, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner Kevin D. Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Judicial Notice)(KW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sutton v. Baker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kevin D. Sutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Renee Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?