Jacobsen v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC et al
| Matt P Jacobsen |
| Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for the RMAC Trust Series 2016-CTT and Clear Recon Corp |
| 3:2019cv00017 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/4/2019. Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery ECF No. #5 is GRANTED. Discovery in this matter is stayed pending further order of the court. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
| Filing 9 REPLY to Response to #3 Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Clear Recon Corp, Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for the RMAC Trust Series 2016-CTT. (Handley, Laurel) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting ECF No. #7 Stipulation to Extend re ECF No. #3 Motion to Dismiss (First Request): Defendants reply due by 2/26/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/25/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re #6 Response, #3 Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Clear Recon Corp, Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for the RMAC Trust Series 2016-CTT. (Handley, Laurel) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to ECF No. #3 Motion to Dismiss, by Plaintiff Matt P. Jacobsen. Replies due by 2/22/2019. (KR) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendants Clear Recon Corp, Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for the RMAC Trust Series 2016-CTT. (Handley, Laurel) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/4/2019. Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to ECF No. #3 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants Clear Recon Corp, Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC. Responses due by 2/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-16) (Handley, Laurel) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Clear Recon Corp, Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for the RMAC Trust Series 2016-CTT. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Handley, Laurel) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Carson City First Judicial, Case Number 18RP000191B, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5389288) by Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, Clear Recon Corp. Proof of service due by 3/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Handley, Laurel) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
