Glisson v. Furlong et al
| Chris Glisson |
| McFall, Primka, Lots, Carson City Jail Commander, Wildblood and Furlong |
| 3:2019cv00025 |
| January 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin Carry |
| Robert C Jones |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff Chris Glisson. (KW) |
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk to SEND plaintiff instructions and approved form application for I.F.P. (sent to p via NNCC Law Library on 1/18/2019); plaintiff to file a fully complete application for I.F.P. or pay the full $400 filing fee by 2/17/2019; if plaintiff does not timeoly comply with this order, dismissal of this action may result; Clerk directed to retain the Complaint ECF No. #1 -1, but will not file at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 1/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP Instruction, #2 IFP Form)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry. (WJ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE - No IFP Application or Filing Fee Received with Initiating Document(s) by Chris Glisson. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Financial Certificate, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
