McGuffey v. State of Nevada et al
| Nevada, State of and Nevada Attorney General |
| Robert Adam McGuffey |
| 3:2019cv00069 |
| February 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Howard D McKibben |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER denying Petitioner's ECF No. #1 IFP Application - payment of $5 filing fee due within 30 days; directing Clerk to retain petition but not file it at this time. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 4/2/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against State of Nevada, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:19-cv-00069. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Robert Adam McGuffey. (Attachments: # 1 Sealed Attachment to IFP Application contains personal identifiers, REMOVED and re-docketed as cm/ecf (# 3 ) #2 Petition for WHC, #3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel)(DRM) Modified on 2/8/2019 to reflect sealed financial information removed & re-docketed as cm/ecf Number 3 Sealed. (BLG). |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Howard D. McKibben and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
