Vick v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
| Karen Vick |
| Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company and USAA Casualty Insurance Company |
| 3:2019cv00070 |
| February 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin Carry |
| Miranda M Du |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to #6 Order, by Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (O'Briant, Priscilla) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 2/19/2019. By Deputy Clerk: LGM. A case management conference is set for 5/29/2019 at 09:30 AM in Reno Courtroom 1 before Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry. Out-of-town counsel shall be allowed to file a motion to appear telephonically after the joint case management report is filed and prior to the case management conference. The parties shall jointly file a case management report by no later than the close of business on Wednesday, May 15, 2019. See the attached order for specifications. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LGM) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to #6 Order, by Plaintiff Karen Vick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Repair bid, #2 Exhibit Email communications) (Castronova, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. Responses due by 2/28/2019. (O'Briant, Priscilla) |
Filing 6
ORDER that Defendant by 2/23/2019, must show cause in writing why this case should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Miranda M. Du. Judge Du's Civil Standing Order is posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website and may be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/8/2019. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV)
|
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/8/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 2/23/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 3/10/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendants Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company, USAA Casualty Insurance Company. (O'Briant, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company, USAA Casualty Insurance Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (O'Briant, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Second Judicial District, Case Number CV18-02413, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5423087) by USAA Casualty Insurance Company, Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(O'Briant, Priscilla) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
