Matuti v. Baker et al
Petitioner: Jeorge Matuti
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General and Renee Baker
Case Number: 3:2019cv00082
Filed: February 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: William G Cobb
Referring Judge: Miranda M Du
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Enlargement of Time to File Certificate re #3 Financial Affidavit by Petitioner Jeorge Matuti (Filed and granted nunc pro tunc per ECF No. #4 Order). (KW)
April 2, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, filed by Petitioner Jeorge Matuti (Filed and denied per ECF No. #4 Order). (KW)
April 2, 2019 Filing 5 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jeorge Matuti (Filed per ECF No. #4 Order). (KW)
April 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that the application to proceed in forma pauperis ECF No. #1 is granted; Clerk directed to add AG as counsel for Respondents; Clerk directed to file and e-serve AG petition for writ of habeas corpus ECF No. #1 -1, petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel ECF No. #1 -2 and motion for enlargement of time ECF No. #1 -3 (e-served on 4/2/2019); motion for appointment of counsel is denied; motion for enlargement of time is granted nunc pro tunc; Respondents to file a response to the petition by 7/1/2019; all exhibits filed by the parties must be filed with index identifying exhibit by number; courtesy copies of all exhibits must be sent to Clerk of Court, 400 S. Virginia St., Reno, NV, 89501 and directed to "Staff Attorney"; See Order for further details and instructions. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/2/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
February 19, 2019 Filing 3 FINANCIAL Certificate and inmate account statement, by Petitioner Jeorge Matuti (DRM)
February 13, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Renee Baker, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:19-cv-00082-MMD-WGC. (KW)
February 13, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner Jeorge Matuti. (Attachments: #1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #3 Motion for Enlargement of Time)(KW)
February 13, 2019 Case randomly assigned to District Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matuti v. Baker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeorge Matuti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Renee Baker
Represented By: Aaron D. Ford-AG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?