Gonzales v. State of Nevada et al
| Yadhir Gonzales |
| Nevada, State of and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2019cv00090 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RECEIPT of Payment: $ 5, receipt number NVRNO004537 (LH). |
Filing 5
ORDER denying ECF No. #3 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Petitioner to pay filing fee of $5.00 by 5/2/2019; Clerk directed to retain the petition, but not file it at this time. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/2/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE - Court Financial Certificate, filed by Yadhir Gonzales. (KW) Modified on 2/22/2019 add link #3 (WJ). |
| Filing 3 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Yadhir Gonzales. (DRM) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against State of Nevada, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:19-cv-00090-MMD-WGC. (LH) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE : No IFP Application, or Filing Fee was received with Initiating Documents, filed by Yadhir Gonzales. (Attachments: #1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Motion for Counsel)(LH) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
