Barrett v. Baker et al
Petitioner: Kenneth D. Barrett
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General and Renee Baker
Case Number: 3:2019cv00480
Filed: August 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: William G Cobb
Referring Judge: Robert C Jones
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2019 Filing 7 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 9/13/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
September 12, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Kenneth D. Barrett. Filed and denied as moot per ECF No. #3 Order. (LH)
September 12, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Copy Work by Petitioner Kenneth D. Barrett. Filed and denied as moot per ECF No. #3 Order. (LH)
September 12, 2019 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Kenneth D. Barrett. Filed and dismissed without prejudice per ECF No. #3 Order. (LH)
September 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. #1 -1) is dismissed without prejudice; a a certificate of appealability is denied; Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #1 ), Motion to Extend Copywork Limit (ECF No. #1 -4), and Motion for Counsel (ECF No. #1 -5) are denied as moot; Clerk directed to file the Petition (ECF No. #1 -1), Motion to Extend Copywork Limit (ECF No. #1 -4), and Motion for Counsel (ECF No. #1 -5) on the docket; Clerk directed to enter final judgment and close this case; Clerk directed to mail Petitioner one blank copy of (i) the in forma pauperis application for prisoners and (ii) form complaint for 1983 civil rights actions (Mailed to P on 9/13/2019). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/12/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
August 12, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Renee Baker, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:19-cv-00480. (LH)
August 12, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Kenneth D. Barrett. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas, #2 Memorandum, #3 Index of Exhibits, #4 Motion to Extend Copywork Limit, #5 Motion for Counsel)(LH)
August 12, 2019 Case randomly assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barrett v. Baker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Renee Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth D. Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?