Gaylord v. Lavers et al
| Rachel Gaylord |
| Robert Lee Lavers and RW Radovich Transport, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00543 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Larry R Hicks |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (DRM) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER granting ECF No. #10 Proposed Order : Discovery due by 6/5/2020. Motions due by 7/6/2020. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/5/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 10 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Rachel Gaylord. (Dion, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Rachel Gaylord. (Dion, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF RULE 26(f) MEETING by Rachel Gaylord. (Dion, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Rachel Gaylord. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Dion, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Filer's account information is different from the address information contained in the filed document, ECF No. #1 , 3 . Attorney Scott L. Smith is advised to review and update his/her user account information. (no image attached) (WJ) Modified on 9/17/2019 complied (WJ). |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants Robert Lee Lavers, RW Radovich Transport, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Ames, Byron) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/3/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 9/18/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 10/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Filer's account information is different from the address information contained in the filed document, ECF No. #2 , #1 . Attorney Scott L. Smith is advised to review and update his/her user account information. (no image attached) (WJ) Modified on 9/17/2019 complied (WJ). |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Second Judicial District Court in the State of Nevada for County of Washoe, Case Number CV19-01310, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5686268) by RW Radovich Transport, Inc.. (Ames, Byron) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 1 NOTICE Of Removal of Civil Action to Federal Court by RW Radovich Transport, Inc.. (Ames, Byron) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
