Nall v. Baker et al
Tyrone T. Nall |
Nevada Attorney General and Renee Baker |
3:2019cv00563 |
September 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin Carry |
Larry R Hicks |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT dismissing case pursuant to ECF No. #3 Order. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 10/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Tyrone T. Nall. (Filed and DISMISSED pursuant to ECF No. #3 Order.)(DRM) |
Filing 3 ORDERED that petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall detach and file the petition (ECF No. #1 -1). The petition is DISMISSED as set forth herein. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/28/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Baker, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:19-cv-00563-LRH-CBC. (DRM) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Tyrone T. Nall. (Attachments: #1 Petition for WHC, #2 Motion for Counsel)(DRM) |
Case randomly assigned to District Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.