Williams v. Baca et al
| Matthew Williams |
| Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2019cv00575 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Carla Baldwin Carry |
| Miranda M Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Notes: The U.S. Magistrate Judge on this case has changed her name to Judge Carla Baldwin effective immediately. (LH) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying Petitioner's ECF No. #3 IFP Application; giving Petitioner 30 days to pay $5.00 filing fee; directing Clerk to retain petition but not file it at this time. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/21/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Matthew Williams. (LH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Baca, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:19-cv-00575. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition for WHC.) (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry. (LE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
