Pamplin v. Bacca et al
| Pamplin John and John D. Pamplin |
| Attorney General of the State of Nevada, AWO Bacca, Bacca and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2019cv00651 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION Requesting a Stay in abeyance for Proper Exhaustion of State Remedies, by Petitioner John D. Pamplin. (LH) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying Petitioner's ECF No. #1 IFP Application; giving Petitioner 30 days to pay $5.00 filing fee; directing Clerk to send Petitioner two copies of this order, one to be returned with payment (mailed 10/29/2019); giving Petitioner 30 days to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as untimely. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/28/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against AWO Bacca, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:19-cv-00651-MMD-WGC. (LH) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Pamplin John. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel)(LH) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (RT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
