Liesegang v. Young et al
| Clay Liesegang |
| Mike Young, The Whitny Park Hotel and The Whitney Peak Hotel |
| 3:2019cv00685 |
| November 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER - Plaintiff has 30 days to file a notice indicating whether he intends to proceed in federal court. The Clerk shall SEND Plaintiff a copy of the instructions and application to proceed IFP for an inmate. If Plaintiff does intend to proceed in federal court, the fully complete IFP application or $400 filing fee is due 30 days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/13/2019. (Forms/instructions attached hereto for distribution to P). (Attachments: #1 IFP Inmate Packet)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (KR) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Clay Liesegang. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel) (All documents captioned for the Sixth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada in and for the County of Pershing.) (KR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
