Doyle v. State of Nevada et al
| Brett Doyle |
| Nevada, State of, Harold Wickham, Renee Baker and Scott Davis |
| 3:2019cv00725 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Brett Doyle. (Attachments: #1 Response, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LH) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying without prejudice ECF No. #1 IFP application; directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff the approved IFP form and instructions (Attached hereto for distribution to P); giving Plaintiff 30 days to file a fully complete IFP application or pay the $400 filing fee; if Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order, dismissal of this action may result; the Clerk will retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1), but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 12/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP Inmate Packet)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Brett Doyle. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (LE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
