Moncada v. Perry et al
| Jonathan R Moncada |
| Russell Perry and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2019cv00739 |
| December 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 12/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Filing 3
ORDER that Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is denied as moot; this action is dismissed without prejudice because it duplicates Moncada v. Perry, Case No. 3:19-cv-00231-MMD-CLB; a certificate of appealability will not issue; Clerk directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Russell Perry, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:19-cv-00739-MMD-WGC. (LH) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Jonathan R Moncada. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus)(LH) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
