Grass v. State of Nevada et al
Barbaro V. Grass |
Nevada, State of and Nevada Attorney General |
3:2020cv00033 |
January 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
William G Cobb |
Miranda M Du |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 1/17/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW) |
Filing 3 ORDER denying ECF No. #1 IFP Application; dismissing this action without prejudice; denying a certificate of appealability; directing the Clerk to enter judgment; directing the Clerk to send Petitioner a copy of ECF No. #1 -1 Petition, a copy of ECF No. #1 -2 Motion for appointment of counsel, two copies of the IFP application for prisoners, two copies of the 28 U.S.C. 2254 form. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/17/2020. (All copies/forms with instructions mailed to P on 1/21/2020). (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against State of Nevada, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:20-cv-00033. (LW) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Barbaro V. Grass. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel) (LW) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.