Collins v. State of Nevada et al
Petitioner: Mark Collins
Respondent: Nevada, State of and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2020cv00147
Filed: March 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: William G Cobb
Referring Judge: Miranda M Du
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that Petitioner's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. #7 ) is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/31/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW) Modified on 4/6/2020 add link to 7(LE).
March 16, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration, re ECF No. #3 Order, by Petitioner Mark Collins. Responses due by 3/30/2020. (KR)
March 9, 2020 Filing 6 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 3/9/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
March 9, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Mark Collins. (Filed and denied as moot per ECF No. #3 Order). (LW)
March 9, 2020 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Mark Collins. (Filed and dismissed per ECF No. #3 Order). (LW)
March 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is denied as moot; Clerk directed to file the habeas petition and the motion for appointment of counsel; the motion for appointment of counsel is denied as moot; this action is dismissed without prejudice because it duplicates Collins v. Baca, Case No. 3:20-cv-00066-MMD-WGC; Clerk directed to enter judgment and close this action; a certificate of appealability will not issue; Clerk directed to add NV AG as counsel for Respondents and electronically serve a copy of this order and the petition upon them (E-service on 3/9/2020). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/9/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
March 4, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against State of Nevada, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:20-cv-00147. (LW)
March 4, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Mark Collins. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #3 Cover Letter) (LW)
March 4, 2020 Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. State of Nevada et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada, State of
Represented By: Aaron D. Ford-AG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Represented By: Aaron D. Ford-AG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?