Brooks v. Director NDOC
| Anthony Brooks |
| Nevada Department of Correction Director and Nevada Department of Corrections Director |
| 3:2020cv00204 |
| April 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION - Request for Correction re Defendant's Name, by Plaintiff Anthony Brooks. Responses due by 6/2/2020. (AB) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Director NDOC by Anthony Brooks. No changes to parties. (AB) |
Filing 3
ORDER P shall submit a complaint by 6/2/2020. Clerk shall send P 1983 form, instructions and copy of his notice of complaint (ECF No. #1 -1). (Mailed to P at ESP on 4/3/2020.) Clerk shall send P IFP application and instructions (Mailed to P at ESP on 4/3/2020.) $400 filing fee or IFP application, with financial certificate and account statement, is due by 6/2/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 4/3/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (LW) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE: No IFP Application or Filing Fee was received with Initiating Documents, filed by Anthony Brooks. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Complaint, #2 Image of Envelope) (LW) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
