Bautista v. Garrett et al
Petitioner: Eberto Bautista-Eredea
Respondent: Garrett and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2020cv00403
Filed: July 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Carla Baldwin
Referring Judge: Larry R Hicks
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Deputy Attorney General on behalf of Respondents Garrett, Nevada Attorney General. Deputy Attorney General Aaron D. Ford-AG terminated. (Perlick, Jessica)
July 30, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Eberto Bautista-Eredea. (Filed and denied per ECF No. #3 Order). (LW)
July 30, 2020 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Eberto Bautista-Eredea. (Filed per ECF No. #3 Order). (LW)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that Petitioner's IFP application (ECF No. #1 ) is granted; Clerk directed to detach, file and electronically serve the petition (ECF No. #1 -1) on the respondents (E-service on 7/31/2020); Clerk directed to add NV AG as counsel for respondents; Clerk directed to detach and file petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. #1 -2); the motion for counsel is denied; respondents to file a response to the petition within 90 days of service of the petition; petitioner will have 45 days from service of the answer, motion to dismiss, or other response to file a reply or opposition; any additional state court record exhibits filed herein; the parties are directed to send any responsive pleading or motion and all INDICES OF EXHIBITS ONLY to the Reno Staff Attorney. See Order for further details and instructions. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/30/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
July 1, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Garrett, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:20-cv-00403. (DRM)
July 1, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Eberto Bautista-Eredea. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Motion for Counsel) (DRM)
July 1, 2020 Case randomly assigned to District Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bautista v. Garrett et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eberto Bautista-Eredea
Represented By: Lovelock Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Garrett
Represented By: Aaron D. Ford-AG
Represented By: Jessica Perlick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Represented By: Aaron D. Ford-AG
Represented By: Jessica Perlick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?